Digital assets like bitcoin are an incredibly speculative hedge against competition. For instance, investing directly in a cryptocurrency is exactly the kind of risk management that crypto would solve within the context of a right-wing government. We do not have a shadow of the type of risk that the kind of volatility that would come out of investing direct in bitcoin or any other asset in a similar situation.
It’s true that the traditional buyer can expect fast delivery to fully fund their investment. Additionally, the projection often deters entrepreneurs and their communities from testing high-risk, high-reward products. If bitcoin shocks the believer, it creates tremendous hype. However, the recent tide of digital adoption shows that rather than creating the usual euphoria, it often ends abruptly.
As the industry matures, so does the rise of cash-centric businesses that mostly accept crypto. What will become of the industry? Some experts say the average age of bitcoin-accepting businesses is only a handful of years. Fortunately, regulators are thinking about how to deal with this industry. There should be a regulatory framework specifically tailored to this situation. Although many technical analysts claim that the price trend of crypto is moving towards the strong direction of fiat money markets